Winter 2002
Issue
Winter 2002 Reviews of Current
Books (Full-Text)
Order
the Winter 2002 issue
Click here
to browse back issues of Harvard Educational Review
Back to top
Harvard Educational Review
Winter 2002 Article Abstracts:
Neoliberalism, Corporate Culture, and the Promise of Higher Education: The University as a Democratic Public Sphere
Henry A. Giroux
In this article, Henry Giroux addresses the corrosive effects of corporate culture on the academy and recent attempts by faculty and students to resist the corporatization of higher education. Giroux argues that neoliberalism is the most dangerous ideology of the current historical moment. He shows that civic discourse has given way to the language of commercialization, privatization, and deregulation and that, within the language and images of corporate culture, citizenship is portrayed as an utterly privatized affair that produces self-interested individuals. He maintains that corporate culture functions largely to either ignore or cancel out social injustices in the existing social order by overriding the democratic impulses and practices of civil society through an emphasis on the unbridled workings of market relations. Giroux suggests that these trends mark a hazardous turn in U.S. society, one that threatens our understanding of democracy and affects the ways we address the meaning and purpose of higher education. (pp. 425-464)
Extracurricular School Activities: The Good, the Bad, and the Nonlinear
Herbert W. Marsh and Sabina Kleitman
In this article, Herbert W. Marsh and Sabina Kleitman examine the effects of participation in extracurricular school activities (ESAs) on grade-twelve and postsecondary outcomes (e.g., school grades, coursework selection, homework, educational and occupational aspirations, self-esteem, freedom from substance abuse, number of university applications, subsequent college enrollment, and highest educational level). Their analyses are grounded in three theoretical models: the threshold model, the identification/commitment model, and the social inequality gap reduction model. They find that, consistent with the threshold model predictions, there were some small nonlinear ESA effects - monotonic increases over most of the ESA range, but diminishing returns for extremely high levels of ESA. Consistent with identification/commitment model predictions, school-based ESAs were more beneficial than out-of-school activities, and the most beneficial ESAs included both nonacademic (sports, student government, school publications, and performing arts) and academic activities. Finally, consistent with the social inequality gap reduction model predictions (as well as the identification/commitment model), ESAs benefited socioeconomically disadvantaged students as much or more than advantaged students. In summary, the authors' findings support the conclusion that ESAs foster school identification/commitment that benefits diverse academic outcomes, particularly for socioeconomically disadvantaged students who are least well served by the traditional educational curriculum. (pp. 464-514)
Teaching and Learning with Thoreau: Honoring Critique, Experimentation, Wholeness, and the Places Where We Live
David A. Gruenewald
In this essay, David Gruenewald weaves a narrative of his education and teaching together with Henry David Thoreau's comments on education, and with stories of Thoreau's own teaching and learning. Gruenewald's personal narrative begins with the discovery of Thoreau as a rare voice of social critique in the education of a typical middle-class adolescent, and then moves to a personal critique of the social context of schooling and the conventions of schooling from the author's perspective as a student and a high school teacher. The second part of the essay explores three teaching themes found both in Thoreau's writing and in biographical treatments of him: experimentation, wholeness, and the primacy of place. Gruenewald discusses each of these themes in terms of Thoreau's approach to teaching, learning, and living. Arguing against the culture of prescription that dominates teaching and learning in schools and colleges of education, he concludes not with more prescription, but with the Thoreauvian plea to reexamine everything we have been told. (pp. 515-541)
Back to top
Harvard Educational Review
Winter 2002 Reviews of Current Books
(Full Text)
Succeeding with Standards: Linking Curriculum,
Assessment, and Action Planning by Judy F. Carr and Douglas E. Harris.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,
2001. 204 pp. $24.95.
In Succeeding with Standards: Linking Curriculum,
Assessment, and Action Planning, a practitioner-oriented publication from
the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Judy Carr and
Douglas Harris provide a highly readable and relatively comprehensive resource
for implementing academic standards. Harris and Carr assemble a wide range of
materials, which they organize around building connections among classroom
practice, curriculum, and assessment, and link the three in an action-planning
process that focuses on clear standards for student performance. Almost all
states have adopted or created academic standards what the authors
describe as a balanced, coherent, articulation of expectations for
student learning and most have begun to develop assessments that
attempt to measure student performance in relation to these standards. This
book offers timely support for practitioners at all levels who are responsible
for implementing standards for student learning.
The book begins with a systemic perspective on academic
standards. Here, the authors unabashedly state the need for standards:
Administrators, teachers, students, parents, and the community
need a clear vision of what is expected in terms of student learning. Clarity
is achieved when districts and schools formally identify standards and then use
them consistently throughout the curriculum process. (p. 2)
Although aligning standards with curriculum and assessment
is necessary, in itself it is insufficient to achieve the linkage advocated for
by Carr and Harris. Linkage requires that educators explicitly delineate the
relationship between what students need to know and be able to do (learning
standards), how learning is expected to occur (curriculum), and how progress is
measured (assessment). It also requires that they delineate the relationship
between the standards and other parts of the educational system. Specifically,
Carr and Harris identify eleven areas that educators must monitor and integrate
in order to link standards effectively: vision, what is currently being taught
and assessed, a curriculum and assessment plan, school decision-making,
resources, a professional development plan, supervision and evaluation, student
profiles, a comprehensive assessment system, reporting, and an action plan. The
authors qualify this assertion by noting that their framework represents a
logical process, not a linear one, and that paying attention to the eleven
areas is recursive, requires an ongoing commitment, and depends on
understanding the systemic nature of reform. For each consideration, the
authors identify key questions that policymakers and practitioners should
answer in designing a well-integrated system that links the learning standards
to the eleven areas. For example, under vision, Carr and Harris ask, What
are the standards, evidence, and learning opportunities to which the school or
district is committed? (p. 3). In considering professional development,
the authors ask, What do teachers need to know and be able to do in order
to teach and assess? How will opportunities to address these needs be provided
over time? (p. 3).
Carr and Harris provide several strategies for linking
these eleven key areas. They borrow from previously published materials (e.g.,
by the Vermont Department of Education) and from practices and tools selected
from their work with K12 practitioners engaged in standards-based reform.
For example, in chapter two, which focuses on the curriculum and assessment
plan, the authors argue that the fundamental decision in developing
standards-based curriculum is assigning standards to specific grade levels,
course, or classroom settings (p. 25). They present a series of questions
to help curriculum developers think through how to introduce concepts,
gradually increasing in complexity and depth (what Harris and Carr call
spiraling):
- Which standards and evidence will be spiraled in the standards-based
curriculum?
- How will students experience the standards and evidence at each
grade level?
- What ways will students apply the standard at each grade level?
- What ways will the student critically examine the standard at each
level? (p. 28)
In the same chapter, the authors provide an
assessment checklist that raises questions about various aspects of
assessment, such as consequences: Is the assessment worth the
instructional time? (p. 33); fairness: Does the assessment enable
all students to demonstrate what they know and can do in the areas being
assessed? (p. 33); reliability and validity: Does the assessment
include explicit criteria for scoring and preferably a guide describing the
application of these criteria? (p. 33); cognitive complexity: Does
the assessment use tasks whose solutions cannot be memorized in advance?
(p. 34); content quality and coverage: Does the assessment use tasks
consistent with the instructional guidelines? (p. 34); meaningfulness:
Does the assessment engage and motivate students to do their best?
(p. 34); and cost and efficiency: Is the assessment administratively
feasible? (p. 34). The authors suggest that practitioners consider each
of these areas when developing a comprehensive assessment system.
The rest of the book provides examples, tools, and other
information designed to help school and district leaders meaningfully link
curriculum, assessment, instructional practices, and planning to clear
standards for student achievement. For example, in the chapters on effective
practice, action planning, and reporting, Carr and Harris provide graphic
organizers, conceptual models, and other tools for reflection and/or assessment
to guide the creation of a coherent, linked educational system. Although the
tools illustrate how practitioners might build a coherent standards-based
system and the models illuminate key concepts, the authors present them as a
smorgasbord of possibilities. They do not provide much guidance about which
tools complement one another, the specific situations that may call for the use
of one over another, or issues likely to surface during implementation.
Although this book provides some practical ideas and
useful tools for creating a coherent system organized around clear expectations
for student learning, the authors do not probe into many of the complexities of
a standards-based approach. For example, Carr and Harris take as axiomatic the
idea that it is good to have consistent practices across classrooms and
schools. In the introductory chapter, they assert:
Clear articulation of district-wide expectations in the areas
of curriculum, instruction, and assessment leads to much greater consistency
across classrooms. Clear articulation provides guidance for teacher
decisionmaking and establishes a common language and focus for several
important areas: professional and school development, supervision and
evaluation, and planning for comprehensive assessment systems and action
planning. (p. 10)
Advocates for greater teacher autonomy, however, will take
issue with the scant attention the authors pay to questions such as whether
having high expectations for all students actually requires greater uniformity
of practice. One can imagine clearly articulated learning standards pursued in
a context of decentralized decisionmaking. Schools and/or teachers in this
policy environment would have greater latitude in their practice while still
being held accountable for student progress toward achieving a consistent set
of standards. The current charter school movement in the United States reflects
such a model. While Carr and Harris do an adequate job of explaining why the
different parts of the system need to be thoughtfully integrated, they do not
offer much insight into the complex nature of many of the larger issues touched
upon in their book, such as where decisions about practice should be made or
where accountability for results should rest. There is virtually no mention of
the context in which practitioners have used the tools or developed the models.
This risks oversimplifying the many challenges of organizational change, be it
in standards-based educational reform or otherwise. Another area receiving
insufficient attention is the role of leadership, which is periodically
mentioned, but with largely superficial treatment. For example, the authors
summarize the foundation of instructional leadership as staying focused on
student results, understanding the origins of the results, and establishing
improvement priorities (p. 59). Yet they do not discuss the necessity of
professional development or instructional expertise.
What Carr and Harris do provide is a clear argument for
taking a systemic perspective, along with some tools to help reformers build a
coherent strategy to link standards to curriculum, assessment, and action
planning. In addition to numerous examples spread throughout the text, the
authors include two appendices: 1) an example of an instrument to assess
teacher training and on-the-job learning opportunities available to them, and
2) a sample district action plan that links the expectations for student
learning to issues around curriculum, assessment, and budget.
In this short, readable, and fairly comprehensive
resource, Carr and Harris do not deeply examine many of the contradictions and
complexities of a standards-based approach. They do, however, describe the
logic of a systemic approach to standards implementation and provide several
useful examples from the field. Succeeding with Standards is a resource
useful to educators who are championing or leading the difficult process of
implementing academic standards in K12 public education.
T.M.B.
The Passionate Teacher: A
Practical Guide by Robert L. Fried. Boston: Beacon Press,
2001. 304 pp. $15.00.
In The Passionate Teacher: A Practical Guide,
Robert Fried argues that many of the difficult issues in education today can be
faced constructively, and perhaps be overcome, by passionate teachers. Fried
has developed the concept of the passionate teacher through his work in teacher
professional development in schools throughout the country. For Fried, to
be a passionate teacher is to be someone in love with a field of knowledge,
deeply stirred by issues and ideas that challenge our world, drawn to the
dilemmas and potentials of the young people who come into class each day
or captivated by all of these (p. 1). Speaking to both experienced
teachers and new teachers, Fried examines several of the challenges that
confront educators including the amount of content to teach, the nature
of assessment, and the most effective ways to motivate students and
illustrates, through stories of practitioners and their teaching, ways that
passionate teachers can work through these dilemmas. While Fried acknowledges
his debt to Deborah Meier and Ted Sizer for many of the ideas that he raises,
his unique and effective contribution to the literature is the connection that
he forges between philosophical ideas about teaching and practical steps that
teachers can take to infuse their own teaching with passion.
The book is organized in five parts. In Part One, The
Passion, Fried demystifies what he means by the passionate teacher. Breaking
passionate teaching down into three components, he argues that passionate
teachers can be passionate about their field of knowledge, issues facing the
world, or children. Speaking to teachers, he says: The passion that
accompanies our attention to subjects, issues, and children is not just
something we offer our students. It is also a gift we grant ourselves: a way of
honoring our lifes work, our profession. It says: I know why I am
devoting this life Ive got to these children (p. 19).
Interweaving stories from practitioners he has met in his professional
development work, Fried brings passionate teaching to life by demonstrating
ways that specific teachers forge relationships with their students, create
classroom environments that promote integrity and respect, and provide students
with opportunities to take ownership of their learning. Students referred to
one passionate teacher who developed close relationships with her students as
not only a teacher, but a kind of mother to us (p. 11). With this
example, Fried emphasizes that students felt so close to this teacher that they
used familial language to describe their relationship with her. Another teacher
pays close attention to the role of the classroom environment in promoting
respect between herself and her students by posting on the walls of her
classroom what she expects of her students and what her students can expect
from her. A third teacher promotes student ownership of their learning by
involving students in the design of collaborative projects that both fulfill
curricular requirements and address student interests and concerns. With these
and other examples, Fried hopes to illustrate practical ways that passionate
teaching can take shape in real classrooms.
In Part Two, The Game, Fried discusses what he believes is
the greatest obstacle that educators face: what he calls having to play
The Game of School (p. 93). As he sees it, educators face
this obstacle whenever nobody cares whats going on intellectually
in the classroom or the school, when the idea of learning is treated as a
mindless duty something to get through any way you can
(p. 93). Students play the game of school when they figure out what teachers
want and treat school as a trick rather than as an opportunity to learn.
However, Fried argues that administrators, teachers, and parents can also play
the same game. For example, administrators who value quiet classrooms and clean
hallways above teaching and learning are playing the game of school. Teachers
play the game of school when they are more interested in covering the
curriculum than in their students learning. Parents who pressure their
children to take on activities or courses with the purpose of constructing
transcripts and records that will impress colleges, regardless of their
childrens actual interests, are playing the game of school. According to
Fried, the way that schools function makes us vulnerable to the game. As he
explains, schools load us up with things to do that help everybody avoid
confronting issues about meaning and motivation and choice in our work
(p. 96). Fried maintains that passionate teachers can change the game of school
by generating excitement about their subject matter, about issues in the world,
and about students and their learning. The genuine enthusiasm that passionate
teachers express in their work can motivate students and focus the attention of
administrators and parents on student learning as the highest educational
priority. In this way, passionate teaching counteracts and interrupts the game
of school.
In Part Three, The Stance, Fried argues that passionate
teachers have what he calls a stance: a philosophy, an attitude, a
bearing, a way of encountering students based on a set of core values about
kids and their learning potential (p. 139). Grounded in this philosophy,
passionate teachers project their stance in their teaching, in their planning,
and in their interactions with students, parents, and administrators. In the
chapter Putting Your Stance into Practice, Fried gives readers
questions to consider as they formulate their own stances as teachers. These
questions are designed to encourage teachers to clarify and verbalize their
values and to uncover connections between their values and students, the
subject area, and teaching and learning:
What are the five most important values or beliefs in my life?
What are the ideas and ideals I try my best to live by? What are five core
beliefs that I hold about children and adolescents? If I were the boss of the
whole school, what words would I like to see greet everyone who entered the
building and every student who walks into a classroom? What is it about the
subject(s) I teach that connects with my core values and beliefs? Why have I
chosen to devote my professional life to this field? What might my students
produce or demonstrate that would prove to me that they had really benefited
from my role as teacher? (pp. 173174)
Fried concludes Part Three with Some Thoughts about
Classroom Discipline, a chapter devoted to the issue of behavior
management in education. He argues that a well-articulated stance that is
grounded in a teachers authentic passion can facilitate respectful
relationships between students and teachers, as well as among students:
Once teachers have done the really hard work of
rethinking how they want to work with students, what they really want to teach
and why, discipline comes down to a few simple rules that almost all students
are able to accept and that many are willing to help their teachers
uphold:
- Every person deserves and owes respect;
- Nobody may interfere with another persons right to learn;
- School is a place to learn how to settle disputes by talking them
through.
(p. 181)
In Part Four, The Student, Fried discusses three ways that
teachers and parents can inspire students to perform at their personal best.
First, he argues that teachers should teach only what is most important about
their disciplines, that the amount of subject matter that covered by most
courses is too great, which gives students only superficial exposure to a wide
range of material. By emphasizing depth over breadth, Fried hopes to encourage
teachers and students to explore the curriculum through engagement with
meaningful ideas and experiences. Second, Fried suggests that teachers give
students meaningful challenges in the classroom, rather than rote or mechanical
activities. He calls these challenges real jobs and notes:
There is hardly an instructional unit that cannot be transformed into a
job that students can plan, organize, carry out and complete for the good of
the community. Only then will we feel their pride and see how capable our
students are (p. 107). Third, Fried recommends that teachers coach rather
than grade their students, as he considers grades poor motivators. Citing
practitioners who use portfolios to collect student work and track student
progress and learning over time, Fried points out that alternative assessment
practices like portfolios are more like what happens in the world students will
encounter when they leave school. As he discusses these specific forms of
classroom practice that support his educational philosophy, Fried grounds his
more general beliefs about teaching and learning in the specific context of
schools.
In Part Five, The Course, Fried describes practical steps
to passionate teaching. Although this information might have been useful sooner
in his text, Fried describes how teachers can set high standards, plan and
organize their courses, and assess their students with the aim of inspiring
excellent performance. By presenting these and other ways that teachers can
inspire their students, Fried brings passionate teaching vividly to life,
making it something that teachers can believe in, strive for, and actually do.
The books penultimate chapter, What to Do Next Monday, gives
readers a way to begin to get in touch with their passions and become
passionate teachers. For example, Fried suggests that teachers begin by listing
the most satisfying elements of their work and listing specific qualities and
abilities that they appreciate and respect in their students so they can
encourage and nurture their students strengths. The book closes with
Is Passionate Teaching for New Teachers, Too? which addresses how
new teachers can develop their passions as they learn to negotiate the complex
world of school. Fried argues that new teachers have a remarkable opportunity
to define themselves and their teaching by creating connections with their
passions.
The Passionate Teacher: A Practical Guide offers an
inspirational perspective on teaching and learning. Furthermore, by skillfully
blending philosophical writing, the voices of real practitioners, and practical
suggestions for becoming a passionate teacher, Fried brings passionate teaching
to life in all its richness and complexity. Works by John Dewey, particularly
Experience and Education and The Child and The Curriculum, would
be interesting companions for this book, as they are the most often cited
formulations of these ideas in U.S. educational history.
Fried uses an informal, conversational tone that makes the
book an engaging read, and his interviews with and stories about teachers seat
the reader at a fascinating roundtable discussion with skillful, passionate
practitioners. Some readers may find Frieds focus too narrow, as he
places the responsibility of facing and perhaps overcoming
educational issues on the individual teacher. Nowhere in the text does Fried
address the ways school structures can inspire and support passionate teaching.
Still, The Passionate Teacher is must read for all teachers, no matter
what subject or age groups they teach, and this book is a particularly valuable
resource for educators of preservice teachers.
R.B.
Harvard Education Publishing Group
|