A Long Way to Go
Forum on South Africa's Education System Highlights Post-Apartheid
Pitfalls and Progress
September 1, 2005
by Mary Tamer
South Africa, with its 28,000 schools and 12 million students, faces
its share of educational challenges in the wake of 40 years of apartheid,
and, more recently, a decade of attempts toward reform. In February, authors
Helen Ladd and Edward Fiske spoke at the Harvard Graduate School of Education
about their recent work, Elusive Equity: Education Reform in Post-Apartheid
South Africa, which details the story of South Africa's racially
based hardships and subsequent efforts to repair the educational inequality
that thrived throughout the country's troubled history.
As part of their research, Ladd and Fiske--writing partners as well
as husband and wife--spent six months living in South Africa in 2002
and visited dozens of schools, focusing their study on two distinctive
provinces, chosen carefully, said Ladd, to represent "two areas
of extremes": the Eastern Cape province, where the white population
in 1996 stood at 5.2 percent and the poverty rate at 64 percent; and the
Western Cape, which is among the two wealthiest provinces in South Africa,
with a white population of 21 percent in 1996 and a poverty rate of less
than 18 percent.

Authors Helen Ladd and Edward Fiske at the Askwith Education Forum
(photo by Paula Telch)"I suspect many of you are here because you
are fascinated by the whole transformation process in South Africa,"
said Helen Ladd, a professor at Duke's Sanford Institute, at the
forum. "We believe, and I suspect you would agree, that education
is central to that transformation process."
The framework of the book, explained Ladd, involved three concepts: race-blind
treatment or equal treatment of schools and students; issues of access
for students of different races; and educational adequacy within a system
in which all races participate fully.
When national elections in April 1994 struck down apartheid, said moderator
Suzanne Grant Lewis, lecturer on education at HGSE, the new constitution
of South Africa included a commitment to democracy, and, since 1996, "the
education policy has aimed to contribute to this new democratic society."
Dramatic changes in policy, however, have met with both success and failure,
and one cannot underestimate, said Ladd, the destructive wake of four
decades of separatism.
"During apartheid, there was very unequal treatment of the races,"
said Ladd, "and people were put in schools by race operated by 15
different departments of education." Funding across the departments
was "egregiously unequal…which changed by the end of the apartheid
era, as efforts were made to improve education for the blacks, but separately
and grossly unequal."The dramatic changes brought on after the 1994
election included the establishment of a national Department of Education,
where norms and standards were set with power given to the individual
schools, each with its own governing body, with race removed as part of
the standard of admission.
"Let's think about equal educational opportunity,"
proposed Ladd."During apartheid…spending differed dramatically
from the black to the white schools, as did the investment in school facilities."
The poorer Eastern Cape, she continued, has "huge numbers of unqualified
teachers" and is lacking in facilities, with only 10 percent of
the schools equipped with media centers.Teachers on the Western Cape,
however, are faced with more stringent educational requirements, leading
to a better-educated faculty and a majority of schools--58 percent--complete
with media centers. There has been some progress, said Ladd,"but
they still have a long way to go."
Still, said Ladd, despite some positive steps toward reform, the "legacy
of apartheid" has set the stage for wide disparities in school funding
and resources among the provinces.
HGSE doctoral candidate Allistair Witten, a long-time principal and teacher
in the South African school system, said his native country has "inherited
a legacy of deep inequality. … There was a flurry of policy changes
in 1994 and 1995…from the policymakers, with very limited sensitivity
to those in the township."
Still, said Ladd, despite some positive steps
toward reform, the "legacy of apartheid" has set the stage
for wide disparities in school funding and resources among the provinces.Co-author
Edward Fiske, an international education writer and former education editor
of the New York Times, explained the curricular component of the South
African system, citing the critical role it played during the decades
of apartheid. With school content controlled by the government, Fiske
said, blacks were limited as to what they could study and for how long,
as it was considered "immoral" to teach blacks at an advanced
level for jobs that they could never have.
"So, when the new democratic government came in, during 1994, they
understood very well, as most transitional governments do, the symbolic
power of curriculum," said Fiske."This was a way to send out
some real signals very quickly that the new role of government and curriculum
was a way…of enhancing opportunity, not limiting opportunity."
Despite tremendous uncertainties and notable challenges-- including
high student drop-out rates, escalating school fees, and other budgetary
and health-based concerns--both Fiske and Ladd agree that the educational
story of South Africa should not be a discouraging one, as the work toward
progress is still in its early stages.
"You can't go through this whole story without coming away
with an incredible appreciation of the importance of history," said
Ladd. "History matters. It matters for understanding the racial
context; it matters for understanding the changes they've made to
date, and it matters for understanding the difficulties for making additional
changes."
About the Article
A version of this article originally appeared in the Summer 2005 issue
of Ed., the magazine of the Harvard Graduate School of Education.