Subject Areas
Resources
Special Sections
HGSE News  
 


From White Rats to Robots
The Future of Human Development

Harvard Graduate School of Education
November 1, 2001
A story from Ed., the magazine of the Harvard Graduate School of Education

Send this page to a friend
About Ed. magazine

Responses in this Series
 Geoffrey Canada

 Howard Gardner

 Carol Gilligan

 Michael Karcher

 Laura Ann Petitto

 David Rose

In the fifty years since the Laboratory for Human Development at Harvard was founded in 1949, the social sciences have transformed the way we humans now understand ourselves. Feminism and multiculturalism destroyed the idea that the workings of white males' minds could define what it is to be human. Technology radically altered, among other things, the way we transmit and consume information. And modern cognitive scientists proved what was previously considered an impossibility: that we can rigorously and scientifically study what goes on inside people's heads. And in all these areas, HGSE's Human Development and Psychology (HDP) area—an outgrowth of the 1949 laboratory—has distinguished itself as a leader.

Laura Ann Petitto, Ed.M.'81, Ed.D.'84 

Today we're on the verge of changes at least as revolutionary as those of the past 50 years. Invoking HDP's track record for seeing what's ahead, we've challenged several distinguished faculty and alumni of HDP to look into the future. We asked them: "What are the key issues and questions just around the corner in your fields? What are the big dangers, the big promises?"

We hope you enjoy the answers.

—Andrew Hrycyna

This response was written by Laura Ann Petitto, Ed.M.'81, Ed.D.'84, faculty member in Dartmouth College's education department.

Revolutions have a way of beginning in the most unlikely places. Some 15 years ago, a revolution in our understanding of how the human brain works was launched in hospital subbasements where researchers discovered that they could look inside people's brains while they were still alive and kicking—a definite improvement over the previous technique of examining slices of dead brains! By suspending a person's head within an opening, affectionately called "the donut," of a machine that measured the brain's blood flow, researchers watched which brain tissue "drank in" more oxygen as a person thought about very specific things.

Since then, by correlating specific blood-greedy areas with specific mental activity, there has been an explosion in our understanding of the neural pathways that underlie our ability to think, reason, learn, remember, read, and use language. Moreover, contemporary neuroimaging research has yielded insights into the brain's stunning ability to reorganize itself in early childhood and identified the crucial time periods in child development during which neural plasticity is at its peak. Imaging research has also shown the way that everyday learning can alter the neural architecture of the developing brain, and helped identify the key factors of the child's environment upon which normal cognitive growth depends.

The Coming Revolution (and Its Dangers)
Indeed, over the coming years these extraordinary discoveries about the child's developing brain shall yield a revolution within education of the magnitude seen in the last century when Piaget's stages of child development swept the world and served as the Holy Grail upon which school programs were based. The biggest dangers will be to avoid the reductionist expectation that each aspect of mental life can and must be identified by specific neural activity before going forward with educational policy building, and we must forever remain aware that the child's developing brain is directly impacted by the situations and contexts it finds itself in; biology and environment work hand in hand.

With these factors in mind, a new understanding of how children's mental worlds develop and change over time promises to revolutionize our methods of teaching and learning in education. The future will shed new light on when and what to teach children, and how children can best be guided to conceptual change, insight, and discovery.

About the Article
A version of this article originally appeared in the Spring 2001 issue of Ed., the magazine of the Harvard Graduate School of Education.

What do YOU think?



HGSE News, Harvard Graduate School of Education
© 2008 President and Fellows of Harvard College.

Classroom Practice | Cognitive Development | Technology & Learning | Urban Education & Equity | Educational Reform | Educational Administration | Subscribe | Advanced Search | Feedback | About the Site | Faculty Research | Faculty Profiles | News Office | Books & Special Features | In the News | Press Releases | On Campus | HGSE News Home | HGSE Home