Askwith Forums

Condoleezza Rice Discusses “American National Myth”

By Jill Anderson
12/08/2010 10:24 AM
2 Comments

Former Secretary of State knows that if the United States is to continue being a leader in the world, so much depends on the quality of an American education.

“Our competitiveness as a country is clearly at risk,” Rice told a packed audience in Askwith Hall on December 2.

During the lecture, “Why Democracy Matters: Education, Empowerment and the American National Myth at Home and Abroad,” cosponsored by the Askwith Forum and the W.E.B. DuBois Institute, Rice reflected on what she called the great American myth that if one works hard, one can achieve anything, even if coming from humble beginnings. This belief, she claimed, is what truly “unites” all Americans.

Rice is worried about how America will continue if it loses the belief in education that unites the people of this country. “The creation of educational system in which people can get skills that they needs is very important,” she said. If these skills are not realized, she continued, and people begin to lose faith, then “the economic climate will grow smaller, not larger.”

Rice shared personal stories that showed how much her own family was committed to the notion that education can be transformative. She was raised in a middle-class African American community in the South by educators committed to sending her to college. On family vacations, she said, they “visited colleges like people who visit National Parks.”

Today, Rice said, her main concern is that all children have access to a quality education like she had growing up. “I’m concerned when you can look at a zip code and can tell whether you will get a good education,” she said. “I will tell you this is terrifying.”

Dean Kathleen McCartney opened the question-and-answer portion of the lecture by asking Rice why she thought only 52 percent of children in the 50 largest cities in the United States had graduated high school.

Rice responded that there are many problems compounding this issue ranging from the fact that America hasn’t responded to globalization fast enough to the breakdown in family structure. She also noted that encouraging self esteem has replaced demanding excellence of students in America’s schools. As an example, Rice shared a story about helping her cousin’s daughter solve a multiplication problem. After reading the girl’s answer, Rice told her it was wrong. The girl responded, “There are no wrong answers.”

Reflecting on the state of America’s children today, Rice pointed out that self esteem should be a byproduct of actually accomplishing something. “We should be as demanding of the students as we are of the teachers,” she said. “I sometimes think that standards have simply slipped.”

, ,

  • Louis Moya

    Just as: “if the United States is to continue being a leader in the world,” said former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice– raised in a middle-class Afro-American community in the South by educators committed to sending her to college, committed to the notion that education can be transformative, and worried about how America will continue if it loses the belief in education that unites the people of this country, and important for whom the creation of educational system in which people can get skills that they need– “so much depends on the quality of an American education, our competitiveness as a country is clearly at risk,” the NMSU faculty head “who is Monica Torres?” wrote: “I have no reason to overturn,” or even question, “the grade of F assigned to you (like a suicide mission in Vietnam to root out the Vietcong) by Mr. Rourke, who you claim for whatever inexplicable reason,” if not just for reasons all his own, “did not return your papers, for the sake of revision, or otherwise.” And though still in the 11th hour, or on a Friday, and with Monday the revision/deficiency-remedy deadline, asking for a concrete proposal on how I planned to proceed with the revision/deficiency-remedy deadline, “this is true,” she wrote, questioning if in writing: “you will need to revise the papers,” or for the sake of which opting out of a trip to NY to visit Ground Zero, he wasn’t simply: “commenting on the amount of improvement it would take for the (probably shredded in a school/maximum security prison cafeteria meatgrinder) papers to achieve graduate-level critical writing. “Mr. Rourke said that he simply did not have an opportunity.” (Nor probably the time, motivation, or incentive). And though it would have allowed for the (probably shredded in a school/maximum security prison cafeteria meatgrinder) papers to achieve graduate-level critical writing, “nor,” she wrote, “given the (completely looked askance at) information I have,” or in spite of it, “did the circumstances for an incomplete exist.” And as for your car being towed which prevented your getting a paper in on time– just as the “brevity and intensity of the summer term,” or in the case of Mr. Rourke, a three-hour and forty-five minute film vs. remedial creative writing class, “challanged faculty to get papers back for the sake of revision in the same timely fashion as a regular semester,” she wrote– well, those are the breaks. You win some and you lose some.

  • Anny Ku

    I agree with Dr. Rice that encouraging self-esteem has replaced demanding excellence of students in America’s schools. In today

Upcoming Forums View All >

Latest Activity

MEDIA CONTACT

Jill Anderson

News Officer
617-496-1884jill_anderson@gse.harvard.edu