by Natasha Kumar Warikoo
Assistant Professor
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Much has been made of the
importance of global competency for American youth to participate in an
increasingly globalized economy, and to understand politics, the environment,
and technology from a global perspective.
These agendas are important and necessary. However, I would argue that they are not
sufficient. Professor Reimers, in his
posting, warned against 'global education light' that focuses on an annual
'world cultures day'. I want to express
a different kind of warning, which is that global education without a
discussion of the important moral and political issues related to inequality,
both domestic and international, will blind youth to the inequalities, past and
present, that plague our world.
Let's start
with inequality in the United
States .
I won't reiterate the significant and stubborn trends of inequality
based on income, neighborhood, race, and ethnicity that affect youth's life
chances. Schools have been quick to
address new immigrant communities with 'global education light', enjoying
potluck dinners and dance festivals.
But, how can we critically engage students in discussions of justice,
fairness, and moral responsibility in an increasingly connected and globalized
world? Global education needs to be
intertwined with global responsibility.
This can be from a young age.
Recently, my daughter's class collected "pennies for peace" to raise
money for schools in Pakistan . Projects like these must develop age-appropriate
activities designed not only to develop students' understandings of life in
other parts of the world, but also to begin to address questions like the one
my four-year-old raised: "Why do we
have money to buy pencils but they don't?" in honest, authentic ways. And, the more that socially responsible
students are empowered to see themselves as agents for change in a globalized,
unequal world, the better off we will all be.
So, one day my daughter might set her sights on social change such that
a "pennies for peace" program will no longer be necessary.
Finally, the more that students can
connect personally and locally to global issues in authentic ways, the more
real and impactful it will be. One means
for this is through their and their friends' family histories of
migration. 24% of children in the United
States have an immigrant parent--that's 14.5 million children. The study of migration has multiple important
and fascinating dimensions--inequality, cultural change, human rights, and much
more. Educators should seize on this
opportunity for real, global education heavy,
with the goal of developing students into global agents for change and
social justice.